First and foremost, a masters degree is something which is not NECESSARY. However, it does have its own benefit. I would suggest you to look up on the profiles of the judges and see how many of them have pursued a masters degree and see in the books written by famous judges all around the world how it helped them. A masters degree is essentially very different from your undergrad study, in terms of the knowledge, exposure and experience. It adds perspective and a chance to select your niche. Since, your goal is to pursue judiciary, there are two ways you can go about ita. You can always pursue the judicial studies even after completing masters and that would give you additional time to prepare for it. There is a lot to read while studying your post-graduate degree and it would give you a different perspective for your ultimate goal. Also, it would provide you a chance to socialise and network. b. If you feel that a masters degree is unnecessary, then you can begin your training for judiciary right after your graduate degree. This would help you to save up time and become a judge sooner. However, in my opinion, a masters degree from a reputed institution would never harm you and only add to your knowledge and perspective (in case your parents really want you to have a postgraduate degree). In the meanwhile, you can intern under a judge and get to know the dynamics better.
@Shagun Shukla A correspondence is good but not great. There are some excellent uniersities offering correspondence post graduate degree, but striclty speaking, a postgraduate degree is a wholesome deal. You get to know people from different backgrounds and professors who are different from your undergrad studies. Could you imagine doing your law school through correspondence? However, there are some great universities that offer correspondence courses, which are good. It would give you a degree and some more knowledge on few subjects. If that is all you're looking for in a masters degree, then it is good. Else, in my personal recommendation, if you decide to do a postgraduate, then don't miss out on the experience and exposure, which is the best part of it.
First and foremost, a masters degree is something which is not NECESSARY. However, it does have its own benefit. I would suggest you to look up on the profiles of the judges and see how many of them have pursued a masters degree and see in the books written by famous judges all around the world how it helped them. A masters degree is essentially very different from your undergrad study, in terms of the knowledge, exposure and experience. It adds perspective and a chance to select your niche. Since, your goal is to pursue judiciary, there are two ways you can go about it a. You can always pursue the judicial studies even after completing masters and that would give you additional time to prepare for it. There is a lot to read while studying your post-graduate degree and it would give you a different perspective for your ultimate goal. Also, it would provide you a chance to socialise and network. b. If you feel that a masters degree is unnecessary, then you can begin your training for judiciary right after your graduate degree. This would help you to save up time and become a judge sooner. However, in my opinion, a masters degree from a reputed institution would never harm you and only add to your knowledge and perspective (in case your parents really want you to have a postgraduate degree). In the meanwhile, you can intern under a judge and get to know the dynamics better.